BACK TO: INDEX OF BIBLE NOTES


BEHAVIOUR IN THE HOUSE OF GOD

 1 TIMOTHY 3:15.

But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. 

Right behaviour in the house of God is almost an unknown thing.  In fact it is probably true to say that almost all christians in assemblies today believe they can do whatever they like as long as it seems right to them.  Judges 21:25.  The contrary is true and the Lord of the assembly, the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, is vitally concerned about right behaviour. 

It is God's house, and we ought to know that even common courtesy dictates that we behave in a manner pleasing to the owner of the house.  It is right that we behave in a way consistent with what the owner expects.  Our relationship with the Lord is measured by our obedience to His will.  "Holiness becometh thine house, O Lord, for ever", Psa. 93:5, is a commandment that is vital in this regard. 

Paul's Directive To Timothy

The apostle had written to Timothy hoping that he would not be delayed, but if he was, he had written so that one may know how to behave himself in the house of God, the pillar and base of the truth.  It is interesting to note that the epistle twice charges Timothy, before God, to obedience in observing these things, and keeping the doctrine that he had been taught.  1 Tim. 5:21, 1 Tim. 6:13-14. 

The Key Word

The key word is behaviour (anastrepho) = conduct oneself in one's manner of life.  We are dealing with the God's house and the Lord is the Head, and we should know how to conduct ourselves in it. 

Obviously then we should learn what offends the Lord.  We should be interested in not upsetting Him, and so we should carefully study His word to be aware of what is required.  We then find there are at least seven (7) areas where we may offend.  Let us be very clear that offence is sin, and as such is subject to discipline.  First we learn from the scriptures that He has placed, in His house, those who are responsible to exercise discipline within the house. Secondly, if we do not accept that, then we must expect it at His hands, Heb. 12:8-11. 

Offensive Behaviour

The seven ways in which we may offend are:

1.         Interpersonal                              Math. 18:15-18

2.         Disorderliness                            1Thes 5:14, 2 Thes 3:6

3.         Division makers                         Rom. 16:17-18

4.         Gainsayers                                Titus 1:9-14

5.         Heresy                                      Titus 3:10-11

6.         Holding evil doctrine                   1Tim. 1:5-7, 2 Tim. 2:16-18, 2Tim. 4:14, 1 Tim. 1:20.

7.         Immorality                                 1Cor. 5. 

We note seven sins which remind us of Prov. 6:16-19.

16         These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

17         A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

18         An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,

19         A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. 

  When we study the seven sins and the six things above we see they affect three broad areas: 

1.         Interpersonal relationships                      Math. 18:15-18

2.         Testimony to the world                           1Thes. 5:14, 2Thes. 3:6

3.         The assembly godliness                         All effect the assembly.

1 

Go to Top of Page

Before studying these 7 sins, for which the New Testament demands a positive act of discipline, note the seven sins of Proverbs 6:16.  They are a: 

1.          proud look, or haughty eyes

2.          lying tongue

3.          murderer

4.          heart devising wicked imaginations

5.          swift in running to mischief

6.          lying false witness

7.         owing discord among brethren. 

All sin has self at the centre, and in the middle of prIde is I, and from that point the carnal christian is capable of committing any sin ever devised by the heart of man.  Let us note some observations before proceeding.

Observations

In every case of discipline there is a very well defined path mapped out in the scriptures as to how the disciplined one is treated.  

First                 the Lord is never in a hurry to exercise discipline.  He waits for the word applied to the sinner's

                        conscience, in the power of the Holy Spirit, to take effect and convict. 

Second            the Lord expects those with a heart for Him to exercise a healing function in love.  It is this

                        concern that is sadly lacking in many an assembly today. 

In every case sin begins a downward path unless arrested.  This path is described in James 1:14.  You see every man is tested  "when he is drawn away of his own lusts and enticed".  Note it is the christian's own desires that draws him away.  Sad to say, however, when true shepherds are missing there is none to detect these early signs, and to restore.  "If a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual restore such an one in the spirit of meekness", Gal. 6:1. 

What a terrible state of affairs when there is no shepherd.  The lament in Ezekiel 34:v2, 4&5, of the Lord, "thus saith the Lord God unto the shepherds; woe unto the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherd feed the flock.....v.4, neither have ye sought that which was lost, but with force and cruelty have ye ruled them...v.5, and they were scattered, because there is no shepherd." 

Without contradiction, over the last 50 years, there has been a dearth in the assemblies.  Usurpers have taken over and the sheep are scattered, or become followers of men. 

Finally note the true shepherd's attitude in Isa. 40:11, "He shall feed His flock like a shepherd; He shall gather the lambs with His arms, and carry them in His bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young."  The Spirit of the Lord is such with His own.  This same attitude is seen above in Gal. 6:1. 

PERSONAL TRESPASS

The first mention of discipline in the New Testament is in Mathew 18:15, but before we look at it we must very carefully, and prayerfully look at the context in which it is placed. 

Is it not remarkable that it follows, "even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish."  The heart of the Lord is ever waiting for the errant one to come to himself and return to the lover of his soul.  Before we begin to study this situation we note that there are three steps that must be taken in order as the Lord demands: 

1.         Meet the errant one in the right spirit as described below.

2.         If he will not hear thee, take two or three witnesses (elders) as directed in v.16, all in private,

3.         If he does not hear them then his refusal is taken by the witnesses to (elders) to the church.

2 

Go to Top of Page

The church then makes the decision.  Details of some sins are not to be mentioned in public. All the elders need to do is to apply the scripture to the situation, and recommend the action to be taken. 

The First Step

But if thy brother trespass, (harmartano) = missing the mark, sin; against thee, go, and tell him his fault, (elencho) = convict, to show the true character of anything; in this case it is to show the man the true character of his fault.  The rest of the verse is quite explicit.  It is done privately between the two people concerned, and not broadcast to all and sundry which in itself is sin.  Even worse than the first. 

Above all the brother at fault is to be approached in meekness, which is not weakness, Gal. 6:1.  It is that attitude which does not have to defend itself.  Everything is in the Lord's hands, there is no need to justify oneself, the Lord will vindicate.  The wronged person needs to be very careful, not emotional, but calm, trusting the Lord.  He is to do nothing more than to show the true position, and apply the word of God, praying for the power of the Holy Spirit to convict the heart of the erring one. 

If the wronged person cannot do this then stay at home until you can approach the sinner in a fit spiritual state to handle the situation.  In fact you may be in a worse state than the person in the wrong if you let pride rule the position.  It will always seek revenge, and justify itself.  It is only the person walking in the Spirit who can rightly act. 

The Second Step

The sole purpose of the first step is to effect a private reconciliation.  The matter is kept where it belongs, and no one else is privy to it, nor should they be.  Unfortunately a christian may harden his heart, and not wish to be reconciled.  At this stage the wrong one meets the sinner again with two or three witnesses, REPEAT WITNESSES, NOT BIASED FRIENDS.  The witnesses should be true shepherds of the flock.  The purpose is the same, the reconciliation of the errant one. 

By this time the Lord is dealing with the sinner, and together with the first visit, conviction and repentance should result.  The prayerful desire of the wronged one is that reconciliation should be effected.  Unfortunately this is not always the case, and the sinner may harden his heart, and continue in sin. 

The Third Step

Sadly if no reconciliation is effected the third step is that the elders (witnesses) take the matter to the church. 

At this time the elders will give godly advice to the church.  It may be most trying as some may wish to side with the sinner, usually relatives.  Brethren, BE ADVISED, there is no problem that cannot be solved by the application of the word of God applied in the power of the Holy Spirit.  It is absolutely invincible!  ("The weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds;) 2Cor.10:4-5.    The church is given the relevant scriptures as in 1Cor 5, Titus 1 Rom 16:17 etc. 

The result of being guilty and named in the church should bring repentance.  It is most sad if this is not the case, because then the judgment is executed whatever it may be, for example warn, avoid or excommunicate.  In the case of excommunication is only recognising the fact that the errant one is both out of fellowship with his Lord, and his brethren when he refuses to be reconciled to either. 

Again one must never lose sight of the context in which the passage is placed.  It is in fact in Math. 18, where the whole chapter has very definite connecting links and the subject is behaviour in a local assembly.  Not a man made one, but a place where the Spirit of God gathers believers to the person of the Lord Jesus Christ.  The point of discipline here is to maintain the holiness of the House of the Lord, and to maintain fellowship between believers.  A study of 1Cor. chapters 1 to 3 clearly expands on this particular aspect of church life.  Certainly God hates sowers of discord between brethren as discord between believers mars the testimony to the unity of the body of Christ. 

Failure to exercise discipline according to the Word of God promotes three positive evils over and above a total disregard for the commandments of the Lord.

3 

Go to Top of Page

1.         It shows a total lack of concern for the brother in error.

2.         Demonstrates a disregard for holiness in the House of God in permitting evil.

3.         It allows the world to speak evil of the assembly. 

These three points apply in every case where discipline is not exercised according to the Word of God.  It should be burnt into the mind of every believer. 

THE DISORDERLY WALK 

To fully understand just what the apostle Paul is describing in 1 Thes. 5:14, one must also study very carefully 2  

  First

1 Thes 5:14,

Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient toward all men. "...warn (noutheteo; admonish, which implies teaching by way of warning) them that are unruly", (ataktos:  not keeping order, insubordinate).  The sentence is then; "teach by way of warning those who are not keeping order in the assembly".  The statement in 1 Thes. 5:14, is a general exhortation, among others for the Thesselonians to observe.   

However the apostle takes up this subject again in

2 Thes. 3:6,

"Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received from us."  

In this passage there are two words which must be understood if the real meaning of the sentence is to be gained.

1.         withdraw: stello; middle voice is, shrink from, avoid

2.         tradition: paradosis; instructions handed down. 

Now we have, "I urge you to shrink from every brother who does not conduct himself according to the instructions handed down (which the apostle says came from the Lord)."  It is indeed a rare thing to see this in an assembly.  It is at this point that we may begin to see a set of spiritual rules emerge.

1.         Gal.6:1, a brother overtaken in a fault restore in meekness.

            This is done in private.  Restore Gal. 6:1, (katartizo; (mend) suggests that patience and perseverance is

            required in doing so.  Hopefully this action is successful

2.         When the spiritual actions in private fail, public teaching with the view to restoration is required.

3.         If the public teaching is ineffective, which by the way should not be the case if carried out in the power of

            the Holy Spirit, then the assembly members should shrink from such an one. 

These positive actions in discipline are all carried out with a view to restoration of the disjointed member.  It is carried out in love, which, by the way, does not condone sin. 

We may now return to the subject, and endeavour to determine what disorderly means.  At this stage we have a general idea, but the apostle becomes more specific in 2 Thes. 3:6-12.  In this case we have seen that the believers in fellowship are to shrink from those mentioned in these verses.  Just who they are, is highlighted in verse 10, "if any should not work, neither should he eat."  It is offensive to God not to work, but more interesting is the result of idleness.  In this case they became "busybodies" (periergoazomai; a special Greek word meaning, "some who are not busied in their own business, but are overbusied in that of others," W.E.Vine) 

1 Tim. 5:13, we find younger widows may learn to be idle and then follows various sins, until it is possible that they may turn aside after Satan, like some in 1 Tim. 5:15.  This is obvious disorder and warnings should be given.

4

Go to Top of Page

Summary

Disorderliness is not conducting oneself according to scriptural commandments.  When one is disorderly it should immediately bring a private warning from those who are true shepherds in an assembly.  If this is not heeded then public ministry should be applied to correct the errant one, and to warn those who may be prone to be led away.  In the meantime the members of that assembly should shrink from the disorderly one.  All this is clear, but human nature will ever intrude in the assembly scene.  Instead of taking the lead of godly elders some may decide to support the one in error. Should the one in error accept this support they become division makers as seen in the next section.   

Whereas it is difficult to distinguish between moral and doctrinal sin, as doctrinal error may lead to moral sin, we have differentiated between them in these notes.  In doing so we find there is a progressive downward path for those taken in doctrinal error.  Disorderliness is doctrinal sin as it is disobedience to the scriptures; "if a man work not, neither should he eat", for example. 

DIVISION MAKERS

This sin is first recorded in Romans 15:17-18.  Now I beseech (parakaleo; to call to one's aid, this calling is meant to produce an effect) in this case it is a call and exhortation to the Roman christians to mark (skopeo; to watch, contemplate) to take a very careful note of certain ones, which cause (poieo: make produce, create) divisions (dichostasia; diche = asunder, stasis = a standing, a standing apart, or separation) in this case between believers in an assembly, and offences (skandalon;  "it is always used metaphorically, anything that arouses prejudice, or becomes a hindrance to others, or causes them to fall by the way", W.E.Vine Dictionary of N.T. words.) 

Now I beseech, exhort you brethren, take a very careful note of certain ones who produce divisions or cliques, and become critical of others, causing some to fall because of the divisions made.  1 Cor. 3:3 tells us plainly that such divisions are the works of the flesh and emanate from carnal men. 

Now all this was contrary to the doctrine they, in Rome, had learned.  The believers were to avoid (ekklino; to bend out from, avoid, keep away from) such offenders.  This was a positive command. 

We can also see that such division makers could be classified as disorderly, which should have attracted warnings.  Act 20:31 tells the elders to, "watch therefore".  Now let us follow the division maker one step further down the slope to shipwreck. 

GAINSAYERS 

The word gainsayer occurs five times in the New Testament, in Rom. 10:21, Titus 1:9, as a verb, and a noun in Jude 11, and Heb. 7:7, and Heb. 12:3.  Gainsay (antilogia; contradiction, opposition) the gainsayer contradicts, and is in outright opposition to the truth. 

The particular meaning of Titus 1:9 is that the elder, "may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort (parakaleo; to urge one to pursue a right course of conduct) and to convince (elencho; to convict, refute) with the purpose of putting the convicted person to shame; the gainsayers." 

Titus.1.v9&10.

9.         Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both

to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.

10.        For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 

Description in Verse 10

Now the apostle begins to describe the gainsayer  as follows:

1.         unruly (anupotaktos; not subject to rule)

2.         vain talkers (mataiologos; idle talking, but not altogether such, as we see bad results

3.         deceivers (phrenapates) = to deceive by fancies.

5 

Go to Top of Page

The picture we have is of someone who is very dangerous to have in an assembly.  It is not possible to bring them to order.  Their talking is empty, but is in fact detrimental.  More dangerous still is that they subvert some hearers.  Having described the offender the apostle now outlines a course of action. 

Action in Verse 11

Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.

Whose mouths must be stopped (epistomizo; to put the mouth to silence).  This is a clear direction.  The same spiritual attitude, which has been outlined previously, must be used in dealing with these offenders.  Remembering always the power to correct is in the application of the word of God, not in force of argument. 

Now for the reasons why such a one is to be silenced.  They subvert whole houses.  Subvert (ekstrepho; to turn inside out, to change completely).  In this case they have converted their hearers from truth to error.  These people must be silenced quickly, they must be given no room to move, and propagate their error. 

This may seem hard to the young believer, but older ones may have seen many a good christian turned aside from the truth because of the lack of action from elders.  The gainsayer teaches things which should not be taught and they do it for a very special reason: base gain (kerdos; to get gain) it often has nothing to do with money as such, but usually has to do with building up a power base of followers.  Having built up a power base then the temptation is to live from their followers. 

In verses 12 to 16 the description of the gainsayer is that of a carnal christian fulfilling his own desires.  Advice for the spiritual; "but speak thou the things which become sound doctrine." 

A HERETIC 

We particularly wish to study the passage, Titus 3:10, with respect to discipline,  "a man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject".  First let us clearly define the meaning of Heretic.  The base word is heresy (hairesis; choice, "that which is chosen, hence an opinion, especially a self willed opinion, which is substituted for submission to the power of the truth"; W E Vine). heretic (hairetikos; causing a division by a party spirit)  

There seems to be three steps, by way of natural progression, to reach heresy that is unfolded in 1Cor.1 to 3. 

1.         1Cor. 1:10, Paul exhorts that there be no divisions (schisma; a cleft, crack) this obviously is a result of         contention,     before breaking into two parts, but as yet the final breakage had not taken place.

2.         1Cor.1:11, contentions (eris; quarrel, strife) the cause of the cleavage, or division.

3.         The final step is heresy when the parties finally divide. 

The meaning of the Holy Spirit's message to the Corinthians was simply that they be perfectly joined together in one mind.  Rather than this being the case, Chloe had reported to Paul, that there were arguments in the assembly.  The arguments were over the ability to select the best leader.  Some had chosen Paul, some Christ etc.  It was their opinion!  Their leader was the best!  They were holding to it, and this was thoroughly condemned.  It was from, "the carnal mind which is at enmity with God." 

Their opinion, which was human reasoning, was totally corrupt.  They were carnal, 1Cor. 3:1, and all such opinions cause arguments.  All opinions must be brought under control, and the scriptures only were to be the guide.  It was never to be the opinions of men, which is the general standard of today. 

The continuation in self willed opinions, in Corinth, had led to 1Cor.3:3, "for ye are yet carnal: for whereas there

is among you envying, and Strife, and division, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?"  The obvious answer is, yes!  To continue on in this carnal fashion leads to heresies. 

The real meaning of heresy is the final division of christians; one from another, due to holding self willed opinions.

6  

Go to Top of Page

Contention was followed by a perceived difference between two or more groups, and finally each group separating, and going their own way.  When you consider it the only way a group of christians, following the scriptural pattern, can break up is by one group being self-willed, and holding an unscriptural opinion.  Otherwise both would agree and obey the Word. 

1Cor. 11:19, "For there MUST be heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest."  This has been the history of the church, and sadly of assemblies in our own time. 

One of the great central truths of the New Testament is almost totally UNKNOWN!  "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular." 1 Cor.12:27.  In the original Greek the definite article "the" is omitted.  This radically changes the meaning.  The verse then means, "Now ye are that which represents the body of Christ, and members in particular." 

It does not take much intelligence to see that a few believers in a locality could never be every believer from the time of Pentecost to the Rapture, which the body of Christ is. 

  Therefore the local church at Corinth could not possibly be that.  What it is, however, is a local testimony to the truth of the unity of that "church which is His body the fullness of Him that filleth all in all." Eph.1:22-23The Lord has gathered believers together, in a locality, to testify to the truth of the unity of the body in the heavenlies.  Anything that mars that testimony should be rigorously guarded against.  The arguments, and party spirit in Corinth had caused the Lord grief. It had to be corrected. 

The division maker, the gainsayer, and finally the Heretic are progressive steps away from the Lord.  The true shepherd, with a right heart, would guard against such to please the Lord, and to protect and feed the flock. 

EVIL DOCTRINE 

Paul wrote two letters to Timothy with very special instructions being meat in due season.  He gave Timothy a special charge in 1 Tim. 1:18,  

Verse 18

This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;

"This charge (parangelia; "strictly a command received from a superior and transmitted to others", W E Vine) I commit unto thee son Timothy according to the prophecies that went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare:" 

Verse 19

Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:

holding (echo; consider, a steadfast adherence to) faith (pistis; the word "faith" embraces two ideas: doctrine as taught of God, and received, and subjectively the state of the soul, J N Darby) and a good conscience (suneidesis: "the witness borne to one's conduct by conscience", W E Vine) which some having put away ( the good conscience) concerning the faith have made shipwreck, (nauageo; break up of a ship; a total loss.) 

Verse 20

Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.

I delivered (paradidomi; to give over) to Satan

that they learn (paideuo; might be taught, passive voice) not to blaspheme (blasphemo; to rail at, or revile) 

Hymenaeus and Alexander; (they had made shipwreck of their faith); whom I gave over to Satan that they might be taught not to rail at or revile. 

7    

Go to Top of Page

This is not very much information, and to get the true meaning from this sentence is difficult, therefore a further search of the scriptures is required to enlighten us. 

Alexander

Very little is known of this man.  It is not certain that he was the same man in Acts.19:33, but very well could be.  It is more likely he is Alexander the coppersmith who "did me much evil".  The apostle then makes the statement, "the Lord reward him according to his works." 

Hymenaeus

This man is linked with Philetus in 2 Tim. 2:16-18, where it is stated, "But shun profane (bebelos; "'that which lacks all relationship or affinity with God" W E Vine) and vain babblings; for they will increase unto more ungodliness (asebia; impiety, usually towards God's person, acting in contravention of God's commands) and their words will eat as a canker (gangraina; = gangrene) of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; who concerning the truth have erred, saying the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some." 

Their Kind

What a terrible picture these two paint!  Alexander was the man who opposed the apostle outrightly, only because he preached the truth.  Truth, no doubt, that was contrary to what Alexander believed.  There is hardly a man of God who has not met his Alexander.  An Alexander who would spread lies, stand up and publicly oppose the truth taught by the servant of God, and continue to increase his power base of followers in an assembly. 

One reason for these notes being written is that the Alexanders of this world can find no foothold in an assembly of God. 

FURTHER LIGHT ON ALEXANDER AND HYMENAEUS 

The only other light on Alexander is in 2 Tim. 4:14, where the apostle says "Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil, (kakos; whatever is evil in character, it is the opposite of good, fair, useful, good in character, good in act).  It is hard to believe a christian can descend to this level.  Observation tells us, however, that such a one in an assembly may stay covert for years, but at an opportune time they emerge in all their hideous evil. 

Let us return to Hymenaeus in 2 Tim. 2:15-18.  In the first place Alexander and Hymenaeus are linked together when first mentioned, and one may safely assume that their position was the same. 

2 Timothy 2:15

In this verse Timothy is exhorted to strive diligently to study with the purpose that God would approve him.  The result of such study would be that he could not be put to shame because of his knowledge and presentation of the word. 

Hymenaeus and Phyletus were the very opposite.  They were accused of blasphemy.  From this verse onward, as we have seen above, Hymenaeus and Phyletus were charged with teaching that the resurrection had already occurred.  Many so-called teachers of today would say this is a minor matter, do not argue about it.  Paul, on the other hand called it blasphemy.  That is, slandering someone, in this case God Himself.  You may ask how? 

The answer to this question is simple.  All false doctrine slanders God's character.  The slander in this case is that God treats His children with partiality.  If the resurrection had already occurred then He had favoured some, and left others to go through terrible wrath of God. This strikes at the very integrity of God, and because it does it has no place in an assembly. 

A WORD OF WARNING

Please note how seriously the apostle treated wrong doctrine.  With him there were no gray areas simply because there are none. 

8 

Go to Top of Page

There is no room in the word, and in the assembly of God for the carnal spirit.  Every single thing is legislated for and is crystal clear.  Many years ago, when young people's coffee hours were coming into

practice in some assemblies, an older brother was asked, "what is wrong with assembly coffee hours?"  The simple reply was, "What does it cater to?"  The young man replied "Oh I see! the flesh." 

Some 20 years ago a man with a young family was invited to a small assembly meeting, and his reply was, "Well I think you have the right doctrine but what can I do with my growing family? I must have something for them."  He went to the Baptist church, his family today are either unsaved or in some extreme pentecostal sect.  In both cases there is no warrant in scripture for such things, and giving way to the flesh has ended up in disaster.  God has counted everything pertaining to the old nature as totally corrupt.  Unfortunately some christians do not. 

In order for the flesh to have its way in an assembly of God the plain commandments of the word are either overturned or ignored.  There are always those who will wrest the scriptures, and teach error to achieve just that end. 

Evil practices, which cater to the flesh, are brought into an assembly without scriptural backing.  Then the evil is supported by wrong doctrine endeavouring to justify that practice.  One common pretext is that it is supposed to be bringing the gospel to the unsaved, or keeping the young ones in the assembly.  The evil method is supposed to justify the end.  Unless the godly elders exercise their God given responsibility the flesh wins the day, and finally the assembly loses its testimony as so many have.  

Comments on Young Ones

Just think about the action above, catering to the flesh is supposed to keep the young ones in an assembly, or make the gospel attractive.  This is a vicious slander of God.  The Lord Jesus Christ died for His own, He is the attraction, and being the tender Shepherd that He is, He gathers His own around Himself. 

This He does in assembly testimony; He gathers, He presides, He is absolute Lord in His own assembly.  There is no thought or consideration given to the flesh, because He is God and, "He seeketh such to worship Him in Spirit and in truth".  The method is always the Spirit and the word of God, not the flesh.  "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword", Heb.4:12; "My word... shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please" Isa.55:11. 

SOME EXAMPLES OF EVIL DOCTRINE

Evil doctrine blasphemes God, and robs the Lord Jesus Christ of His

glory.  It would make it easier for christians to judge doctrine using this basis as a first test.  Examples: 

    WRONG DOCTRINE                                             THE SLANDER

1.         No eternal security         God's love is limited, and the work of the Lord Jesus Christ is not sufficient to                                                 save. 

2.         A partial rapture             God is biased against some believers, and does not treat all equally as to His

                                                love. 

3.         God has not legislated    God leaves His children to fend for every contingency for themselves, and His

                                                word in life or assembly is not sufficient to furnish unto every good work.

 

4.         We need music              The Holy Spirit given believers is to accompany the insufficient. He has been

                                                remiss singing in the and we have to rely on the flesh assembly

 

5.         Must select speakers     Again the Spirit of God cannot in assembly meetings perform His function

                                                without the assistance of the flesh.

 

Of course there are many other examples, but this gives us a method of judging whether the doctrine is correct.  Note, God is defamed, and the Lord is robbed of His glory.

9 

Go to Top of Page

A common erroneous defence is, "well the scriptures do not say you can not do this thing".  This statement in itself is wrong doctrine. The word will either approve or condemn outright. God's word is clear in every detail.  The scriptures clearly count the flesh as dead and buried; "that so many of us as were baptised into Jesus Christ were baptised into His death.  Therefore we are buried with Him by baptism into His death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life." Rom. 6:3-4.  We must be satisfied with the all sufficiency of the Lord Jesus Christ and His word. 

Much has been made of wrong doctrine in these notes because today we are at the end of the moral history of the church.  Laodicea is its nature.  Yet 150 years ago one could rightly say the assemblies were Philadelphian in character.  We see failure on every hand.  What has happened? 

Assemblies fail because the elders fail.  There is no discharge in this warfare.  Furthermore, "the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds", 2 Cor. 10:4.  The spiritual elders should never fail; the total infinite power of God, is available to them in the word, but how miserable has the use of them been. 

Evil men have crept in, and been brought in, wrong doctrine has been taught, discipline not been exercised, and finally a great falling away has occurred.  Let us cleave to the Lord with purpose of heart. 

IMMORALITY

Much has been written in the New Testament scriptures concerning immorality which the reader should study.  However the purpose of these notes is "behaviour in the House of God", in particular the exercise of discipline.  The relevant scripture is. 

1 Cor. 5

Verse 1

It is reported                                                                (akouo; the hearing of a message)

commonly that there is                                                (holos; the reputation you have by common report,

fornication among you, and such fornication

as is not so much as named among the Gentiles,

 that one should have his father's wife.

 

Some meetings that used to be assemblies have almost reached this low moral standard. 

Verse 2

And ye are puffed up, and have not rather        (phusioo; puffed in the sense of being puffed up with pride)

 mourned, that he that hath done                     (pentheo; sorrow, like the sorrow at the death of a loved one)

this deed might be taken away from

among you. 

It was distressing for the apostle to hear of such a sin, but even more distressing was the fact that the Corinthian christians could tolerate it.  Had they not learnt that "holiness O Lord, becometh thine house for ever."  Every saint should have abhorred the very thought of such a sin. 

Furthermore the crowning shame was that there was pride and no sorrow.  This no doubt is seen throughout the whole epistle.

1.         Pide in their selected leaders

2          Pide in their gifts received from God

3.         Pide in their spiritual achievements. 

Let us take this lesson to heart for we notice that wherever, in this day and age, there is a boasting in the gifts given by the Holy spirit, and even in false gifts such as speaking in tongues, one finds immorality.

10 

Go to Top of Page

Verse 3